AI Analytics Tool Drives $500K Pre-Sales and Revenue for PR Agency
Industry: Public Relations
Client
Hill + Knowlton Strategies
Goal
Phase 1: Establish a three-month data and AI roadmap, enabling the client to use modern tooling for target-audience identification and impact reporting.
Phase 2: Lead delivery of the first project: a data- and AI-enabled analytics tool showing daily PR campaign impact to customers, designed to generate revenue from day one.
Challenges
- Contradictory, poor-quality engagement data
- The product needed to be revenue-generating from day one
- Industry-wide skepticism about data
Solution
The project was not internal and had paying customers lined up, placing strong demands on quality and reliability. The team addressed this by relying heavily on existing external services for data provision and focusing on building only those internal components that were necessary to add value.
The team implemented AI-driven cleaning and classification of diverse data sources, then applied statistical techniques to extract a reliable signal. They refined the modelling, guided by industry expertise, until meaningful results could be presented.
Whilst the data team at H+K were highly skilled and data literate, this did not always translate into enthusiasm for data-informed decision making across the industry. The HoAI led efforts to bring stakeholders along and demonstrate the usefulness of metrics incrementally. This was coupled with clear visual presentations of impact for H+K’s clients that avoided unnecessary technical detail.
Impact:
The first product generated 500K in pre-sales before launch, based on the product description and mock-ups alone.
The first product was standardised and offered as an add-on to all H+K customers as part of a suite of services.
Data and AI are now revenue generators for H+K (now Burson); the initial product evolved into Reputation Capital, their AI solution suite.
Context
A global public relations agency engaged a Fractional Head of AI to deliver a two‑phase initiative. Phase 1 was a focused three‑month Data & AI roadmap to help the agency incorporate modern AI and data tooling for identifying target audiences and reporting campaign impact. Phase 2 was to lead the team that delivered the first customer-facing product: a data and AI‑enabled analytics tool that displayed the impact of PR campaigns to customers on a daily basis. Critically, this tool had to be revenue generating from day one of launch, and it had paying customers lined up before production.
Challenges
The project faced three interlocking challenges. First, engagement data arriving from multiple sources was contradictory and of uneven quality, making straightforward attribution and impact measurement unreliable. Second, the product had to generate revenue from day one, creating intense pressure on reliability, accuracy and customer confidence at launch. Third, data skepticism was widespread across the PR industry: while the internal data team was highly skilled and data literate, many stakeholders and clients were not yet convinced that data‑driven insights would meaningfully improve PR decision making. The team needed to address both technical data quality problems and behavioral resistance to analytics.
Implementation
Our Fractional Head of AI led a pragmatic, risk‑aware implementation that prioritized customer value and reliability. Because the project was not an internal experiment but a commercial product with paying customers, the team leaned heavily on established external data providers and managed services for core data ingestion and normalization, reducing time to market and minimizing operational risk. Internal development was tightly scoped: only the services that added clear, unique value—AI cleaning, cross‑source classification and a lightweight analytics engine—were built in house.
AI‑driven data cleaning and classification were the technical backbone. The team designed pipelines that used machine learning to reconcile contradictory engagement signals, classify disparate content and enrich records with audience metadata. Rather than relying on black‑box algorithms, models were iteratively refined against real campaign outcomes and guided by PR industry expertise to ensure outputs were meaningful and defensible. A layered statistical approach was used on top of the cleaned data to extract plausible signals: baseline comparisons, time‑series smoothing, and controlled uplift estimates were combined to surface daily campaign impact while communicating uncertainty appropriately.
Equally important was adoption design. To overcome industry skepticism, the roadmap included change management activities and progressive evidence: early prototypes and mock‑ups were shown to client stakeholders, metrics were validated in short pilots, and visualization design prioritized clarity over technical detail. Dashboards presented a concise narrative of impact, with options to drill down for technically minded users but defaulting to simple, actionable KPIs for most clients.
Because customers had committed before launch, reliability engineering and monitoring were built in from day one. The team implemented automated quality checks, alerting and fallbacks to managed data streams so that any external provider issues would not degrade customer experience.
Results
The combination of focused product scope, AI‑driven cleaning, defensible modeling and clear presentation paid off. The first product generated $500K in pre‑sales prior to launch based on the product description and mock‑ups alone. At launch the tool delivered daily impact reporting reliably and became standardized as an add‑on offered to all customers as part of the agency’s services suite. Over time the initial product evolved into a broader AI solutions suite for reputation analytics and became a consistent revenue generator for the agency (which later rebranded). Beyond direct revenue, the program demonstrated how targeted AI and pragmatic engineering can convert industry skepticism into measurable commercial and operational value.
*Case studies reflect work undertaken by our Heads of AI either during their tenure with Head of AI or in prior roles before they were part of the Head of AI network; they are provided for illustrative purposes only and are based on conversations with our Heads of AI.