AI Roadmap Identifies £4M Annual Operational Savings, Wins Renewal
Industry: Renewables Energy Marketplace
Client
CGI / DCC
Goal
Client bidding to renew a services contract needed an AI strategy to cut costs. Our Fractional Head of AI worked with the Executive VP and team to prioritise 10 use cases with business cases, projecting £4m savings on a £28m budget for ~£300k, and delivering a roadmap and transformation path.
Challenges
- A complete lack of understanding of how agentic automation and information retrieval could be applied to automate business operations.
- Limited visibility into current operational costs and the potential financial benefits of AI adoption.
Solution
Developed an adoption framework, conducted use-case walkthroughs, and delivered rapid proofs of concept (PoCs).
Conducted workshops to capture operational pain points and costs; selected the most complex and promising pain points for AI-based solutioning (including agentic automation and retrieval-augmented generation); and developed a business case for implementation approval along with a programme plan for transformation based on selection criteria: ease of implementation, impact, and cost to implement.
Impact:
Identified approximately £4m in annual operational savings from a £27m budget.
The customer won the contract renewal based on: (a) identified savings that enabled the lowest bid; and (b) a demonstrable commitment, adoption framework, and plan for AI adoption.
Context
A services provider operating in the renewables energy marketplace was bidding to renew a major contract to supply operational services. The customer needed a clear AI strategy and adoption plan to reduce operational costs and make a competitive bid. Our Fractional Head of AI worked with the Executive VP and the senior leadership team to map potential opportunities: roughly 80 use cases were identified across operations, customer support, and back-office functions, with robust business cases developed for the top 10. The programme deliverables included a technology roadmap, a transformation path, an adoption framework, and rapid proof-of-concepts to validate approaches. Estimated savings from the selected use cases were circa £4m against an annual operating budget in the high £20 millions, with an implementation investment of approximately £300k.
Challenges
The organisation faced two principal challenges. First, there was a total lack of understanding of how agentic automation and modern information-retrieval techniques could be applied to automate and streamline business operations. Leadership and operational teams were unfamiliar with how Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and agentic workflows could reduce manual effort, accelerate resolution times, and improve decision quality. Second, the organisation had limited visibility into the true cost of current operations and therefore no reliable baseline for estimating the potential financial benefits of AI adoption. This made it difficult to prioritise initiatives, produce credible savings forecasts for the renewal bid, or build a compelling investment case for transformation.
Implementation
The engagement began with targeted workshops to capture operational pain points and to quantify time and cost drivers across processes. Workshop outputs produced a catalogue of circa 80 candidate use cases. The team then applied a clear selection framework to prioritise opportunities based on three criteria: ease of implementation, expected impact on cost or service quality, and estimated cost to implement.
Selection emphasised the most complex but promising pain points where agentic automation and RAG could deliver step-change improvements—examples included automated triage and remediation of service incidents, intelligent document and contract retrieval for rapid decision support, and automated customer communications driven by contextual knowledge. For the top 10 use cases, the team developed full business cases that included savings calculations, implementation costs, risk assessments, and required technology stack components (cloud-hosted models, vector databases, orchestration layers).
Deliverables produced by the Fractional Head of AI and the project team included:
– An AI adoption framework defining governance, roles, and a phased rollout approach.
– A technology roadmap and transformation path detailing integrations, security considerations, and recommended cloud services.
– Use case walkthroughs and rapid proof-of-concepts to validate technical feasibility and refine cost estimates.
– A programme plan for deployment, including timelines, resource plans, and KPIs tied to the bid.
Agentic automation was modelled to orchestrate multi-step tasks where autonomous agents can query knowledge stores, take actions, and escalate as needed. RAG-based retrieval systems were designed to surface the right operational documentation and historical cases in seconds, reducing manual search time and error rates.
Results
The engagement delivered a measurable and defensible outcome: identified operational savings of approximately £4m annually from the prioritized use cases, representing a material reduction from a high £20m annual operating budget. The proposed implementation required an estimated upfront investment of c. £300k, producing an attractive payback profile. The business cases and rapid PoC evidence enabled the senior leadership team to present a credible, costed AI adoption strategy as part of the renewal bid.
As a direct result of the savings identified and the demonstrable commitment to a structured AI adoption programme, the customer won the contract renewal. The savings allowed the organisation to submit the lowest competitive bid while the adoption framework and roadmap provided assurance to the contract owner that the supplier had a realistic plan to reduce costs and improve service delivery. The project therefore delivered both immediate commercial advantage and a clear transformation pathway to capture the long-term operational benefits of AI.
*Case studies reflect work undertaken by our Heads of AI either during their tenure with Head of AI or in prior roles before they were part of the Head of AI network; they are provided for illustrative purposes only and are based on conversations with our Heads of AI.